bayanoh

It's for best original song. They give more time to movies. It is fair since they spend much time and effort making them.

They didn't win for the movie. They won for a song. The time is distributed based on category, not based on how popular the "streaming" movie that the song was in. They don't get points for the popularity of the movie since the song is the one that is getting awarded.

I think Koreans and KPop fans are just used to their award shows giving them lengthy time for literally every cast member to give their speech. They should've watched a couple of Oscars before this one. Rarely any production work get enough time to go through all their cast members, let alone a group that is winning for just a song, that's a mediocre category. People spend years making their movies, spend a lot of money on them, and with a lot of people participating in the production, of course they would get more time. They should've just chose a representative who should thank all the team and whoever supported them. EJAE's speech was actually enough. The other person was about to take 5 minutes reading a speech from a card in a language they aren't fluent in. I doubt there are many people watching the OSCARS for the best original song category. I think someone is pretty entitled, and are now requesting an apology like they always do for the smallest "issues".

Speaking as someone who didn't watch the second season to "get to know Babi well", the guy was obviously eyeing her even when she was in a relationship. His move was to be extremely nice to her and act all innocent like "your boyfriend is possessive and I'm just your friend". Ew

I didn't watch beyond the first season to be honest. It's because I thought that her having a relationship with Babi is acknowledging that the guy in the first season was right all along and there was actually a valid reason for his jealousy which didn't sit well with me, because she made it seem like he is crazy so I felt bad for him.

Did you tag the wrong person? I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Pointless and unrealistic. The villain was one of the very few highlights of this, the action scenes are good but there are too few of them, and the rest is just boring. Even the post-credit scene was totally uninteresting. I wouldn't watch what they are teasing.

Love the new poster. Dooly was a recurring character throughout Running Man. I remember the characters being mentioned since the earliest episodes of Running Man, so it is relevant. I'm glad the winner of the deciding episode chose this theme instead of their own because I was sincerely rooting for it.

Very predictable. They give you obvious clues from the start. It is hard to take it seriously. No twists and no shocks. You can see what's coming a mile away.

Loved it. It was hilarious.

episode 60

It's more like The TruGary Show episode where they did the same thing to Gary.

You are not as intelligent as you think if you think that you can measure someone's intelligence by looking at their movie preferences.

I'm trying hard to finish this. The short scenes are giving me a headache and the sequence doesn't make sense. I think they are trying too hard to make the film look sophisticated, especially with the filming angles, like the one where he is talking to his kid while she is playing on the swing. It looks like a bizarre dream that I don't want to have because I know I will wake up with a headache.

He is on a timeline on his own. He is probably the only highly paid actor in that timeline. The main story is in the other timeline, he would just appear if there was a contact. Saying that they would reshoot the entire series is a stretch.

and again I'm not saying it wouldn't cost a dime, but if they canceled the whole series, they would have a certain 100% loss, if they delayed it too much people would lose interest and they would lose what they already spent on marketing. There is no guarantee that the situation would cool down, so they might not have a chance of airing it. From a production standpoint, their best move would be to reshoot his scenes, they would add extra to the budget, but they end up with the return that covers all the cost and more. Otherwise they are just throwing their money.

I'm not saying that there won't be any trade offs. There is canceling the broadcasting after all the cost and effort that has been put into it, and there is reshooting just the scenes where he is involved and cutting the scenes that could be cut. What is better in your opinion?

And no, they definitely wouldn't have to rewrite and re-film the entire thing. Just his scenes. They can even dub the new name post-production.

I'm sure there is the hope that you can change K-netizens' minds, but let's be realistic. They have to do something that doesn't involve a miracle.

Regardless of what I think about the controversy,
I think the character itself is replaceable.

Technically speaking, I think Jo Jin Woong did a great job portraying his character, but the plot involved a machine with two people communicating from different timelines. They can just create another character that stumbles upon the machine and it won't hurt the plot. They could've created a whole new time with completely new setting, if they hadn't already started, but since they did, a new character in the same time would totally work without jeopardizing much.

They said romantic, but in the sense that it triggers positive emotions or "romanticization" (whether around the place, the situation or the people).

It's probably because it was in a different location where the main PD couldn't go so she delegated the task to another PD. You can hear her voice in the next episode preview. They always announce beforehand if the main PD is changing.

Daniel is a member (a rental member is still a member)
In the preview of the next episode, they called Ye Eun, Daniel and Kang Hoon the youngest (maknae) members, but wrote in the caption under Ye Eun "real maknae", and under the other two "first rental member", and "second rental member"

You are bad at coming to conclusions. That's my conclusion. Nothing in my comments refer to her sex. If it was the guy who was doing that I would've arrived to the same conclusion. It's just that I was raised well. To me, raising a sharp object to threaten someone with it is almost as bad as stabbing them with it. I don't do that, I would never think it's ok or excusable, and I don't that's a valid way of letting the other person know that you are not a pushover. I thought we are having a discussion, but it appears that I have wasted my time. Have a good day.