Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: 6 hours ago
  • Gender: Female
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 301 LV3
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: September 15, 2019
Replying to peoplez Oct 12, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
I definitely expected more from JSM because she is very good at skit - I think the detective element of the show…
I think "the one who has the biggest motive" is not always true, that's why I consider it a gut feeling, not a deduction based on evidence. I don't like obvious evidence either, but in this case there wasn't any physical evidence at all. The napkin was easily explainable by many things that isn't involvement in murder. That is why I didn't like this episode. If that was a real person, we would say that "the jury" jumped to a conclusion and put a man who might be innocent in prison. I hate when there is still reasonable doubt, and they end up choosing the culprit by luck, that their own gut feeling turned out to be true.
Replying to peoplez Oct 10, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
I definitely expected more from JSM because she is very good at skit - I think the detective element of the show…
Yes, but what's the point of the episode if they just went with their guts at the end? I don't know, maybe I was expecting better physical evidence. Their faces before the final voting says it. They were as clueless as when they started. Haha
Replying to _Shinigami_ Oct 9, 2025
Wohoo! I just finished watching this season and thought it was great from start to finish!! Hopefully they'll…
I hope they would change the cast. I think it's gotten a bit too easy for them to solve the crime, and for us to tell who the culprit is based on how they are acting.
Replying to MiszT Oct 9, 2025
ep 1 1st crime, that is a doll right, when she is on the floor and flipped over, you can see its a doll
All victims are dolls. They lay them there until the end of the filming
Replying to bayanoh Oct 7, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
The final case (Ep9-10 The Casino) was definitely the worst.The second case (Ep3-4 The Funeral Makjang Drama)…
The final case is unsolvable using evidence. Even their most "decisive" evidence doesn't point with certainty to the culprit. If they weren't bad at lying/acting, you can't tell who has done it. Also, their motive (story) is ridiculous. It's not realistic at all.
On Crime Scene Zero Oct 7, 2025
The final case (Ep9-10 The Casino) was definitely the worst.

The second case (Ep3-4 The Funeral Makjang Drama) was the best.
The first case (Ep1-2 The Hospital) and the fourth case (Ep7-8 The Night Club) were watchable.
On Crime Scene Zero Oct 7, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
In the last episode,
Jang Dong Min's face when Jeon So Min asked for the napkin was hilarious. I knew it was the "decisive" evidence as soon as I saw it. He remained nervous until they wrapped up the investigation.

Jeon So Min is dimwitted as usual, I can't believe she didn't notice his face and didn't check the napkin with the UV lights. They were all checking everything of his with the lights just moments ago, and she decides to just scan it with her eyes.

In real life, this evidence won't fly on court, though. It isn't as decisive as they made it seem (even though his face was). He could've easily said that he wiped his hands after playing a card game earlier that day, or that he didn't wash the napkin and the cream accumulated through a period of time.

They totally guessed it this time. Maybe from Jang Dong Min's bad acting. He kept saying he didn't know anything. That can't be right. There wasn't any real evidence they found that could indict him.
Replying to fasyu Oct 7, 2025
this is actually the most screentime an assistant detective has. previous seasons assistant detectives would only…
I don't think that's true. The Detective Assistant in season 3 got a lot of screen time to the point where he became a supporting character. This assistant only had one extra scene where he brings the inflatable boat, thanks to Kim Ji Hoon who seemed to have been actively trying to get him more screen time, but yes, they don't usually do anything, unless the detective is considerate enough to involve them. They are usually people who are not popular in variety, and have minor roles as actors or idols. It's an extra role that they take on so that they can get more recognition.
Replying to bayanoh Oct 3, 2025
I'm still at the 5th episode, but there is no way IU and Bo Gum could pass for 37 year old even with alteration,…
I'm kinda losing interest after the 4th. It was fast-paced in the episodes 1-4. The fifth episode dragged a lot. I don't think I'm that interested in their "happy together" years. I like to see their struggles.
Replying to Sinem Oct 2, 2025
not finished yet but i really wish they only go with their young story, those parts was something else it was…
I'm still at the 5th episode, but there is no way IU and Bo Gum could pass for 37 year old even with alteration, especially at that time and with their struggle. IU barely passes as an adult. Have you seen a 37 year old in the 60s?
Replying to raynorhunter Oct 2, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
Ep7 kinda bothered me. They clearly stated she was trans, and yet some of the actors continued to act like that…
In most countries, they only change pronouns if they had a sex change surgery, otherwise they are just cross-dressing. Not all of the cultures follow the US. In this specific case, the victim goes by both male and female, they never had a sex change surgery, they slept with Golden Spoon as male, and they have a name for each gender. So, they talk about them as female if it's the female character, and as male if it's the male character. It isn't offensive, it's just a normal process even if you are not intending to assume gender, because the victim never stuck to a gender. So, each person was calling them as they view them.
Replying to bayanoh Oct 2, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
In the 8th episode, why were they contemplating?
They guessed that the water sensor was manipulated. Why would they think that the business owner used it to make an alibi for the dancer? Manipulating the alarms because "he knew she was going to look for him" was such a bad excuse. There is no benefit for him to do that. It irritated me that this wasn't obvious to them. Of course she did that so that she can have an alibi to go move the body. What is it for the business owner? He can just say "I'll go do bla bla" or just leave and no one will even question it. He is free to do whatever. He can leave the meeting on his own free will. The dancer is the only one who has someone to answer for. She was the only one who needed a reason to leave the meeting so that her boss won't ask for her. There was no need for him to manipulate the water sensor just so that he can get the dancer out of the way. Haha

That was ridiculous. It made me so angry that this simple conclusion didn't cross their minds, even though Kim Ji Hoon told them exactly what happened and that "of course she did that so that I would tell her to go fix it and she can move the body". I was like "Thank you!" when he said it, and thought of course they would agree that this is most probably what happened. If he was going to manipulate the water sensor to make an alibi for himself, he would've gone to "fix it" himself.
Replying to Ackery Sep 30, 2025
Title Mantis
Your points are valid plus I also preferred Kill Boksoon. However, I think this movie is still easy to understand…
I did the same and I don't remember the meaning of a bloody knife. I might've missed it if they explained it again in this movie, but the whole background was pretty confusing to me, since I vaguely remember Kill Bok Soon.

My memory of it is foggy, since it wasn't such a masterpiece, and I also kept confusing it with the plot and setting of John Wick. However, I think it's such a waste to start this, and be forced to skip Kill Bok Soon all together, especially since they spoil its ending.
Replying to bayanoh Sep 29, 2025
Title Crime Scene Zero Spoiler
The second one was deliberately silly. It is supposed to imitate a makjang drama where events are too ridiculous…
I think the members agree with you too. They voted almost unanimously for this person, and looked down on the one who didn't vote the same. I also thought they were bad at it, especially since they kept refusing to explain things, and kind of lied at times, but I thought that they were were going to be saved by the other people who were acting really suspicious, and that they were getting away with it. In the first case, I thought there is no way they are getting away with it.
Replying to bayanoh Sep 29, 2025
I didn't like Busted, to be honest. I thought Crime Scene has done it better (because I have watched the first…
Yes, except for the actual actor, they are not good actors. Haha
I often figure out who the murderer is as soon as they gather at the beginning, but I spend the rest of the episode figuring out how and why.

I know that some of the members of Busted are smart, that is why I said most of them are not, not all of them. While I don't know their actual IQ, some of them are obviously on a different level.

What I was getting at, is not calling all the members of Busted stupid, but I was trying to highlight the difference between the shows in terms of casting. In this show, all of them had proven one way or another that they are above average in terms of intelligence, even before the show was created. This explains why most of them are bad at acting, because they didn't pick them for their sense of humor or their great acting skills. They went for people who are known to be intelligent.

To me, these shows are not comparable, they are totally different from each other, so I understand that this didn't suit your taste, even though you liked Busted.
Replying to Marcrisan81 Sep 29, 2025
Unbearably boring! 🙈 How can this be so bad? I don't understand... I'm a fan of shows like Busted, Agents of…
I didn't like Busted, to be honest. I thought Crime Scene has done it better (because I have watched the first three seasons at the time). Busted felt linear because they were forced to go to places and meet with NPCs without actually using their brains. The puzzles were set up for them like they were in a game, so the clues weren't realistic. Also, most of the members were of a low to medium IQ, so no one was impressive or did anything impressive on that show. If they added someone clever, like Kim Jong Kook or Hong Jin Ho, it might've helped a little.

What I like about this show that isn't in Busted is that the clues are realistically done and scattered. You don't have to solve a fake puzzle set up by the production team to solve the mystery, you just have to think like a detective. Also, they don't point you to a direction, you can find a big clue at the start of the episode, and then find smaller clues. It is not as linear as Busted where the production team guides them where to go and set the scenes in advance.

My advice is to try to watch the second case before dropping it. If you are looking for comedy, it's definitely more fun than the first one.
Replying to _Shinigami_ Sep 29, 2025
I really enjoy watching this series!Personally, I liked the first case better in terms of the plot, the actors,…
The second one was deliberately silly. It is supposed to imitate a makjang drama where events are too ridiculous to happen in real life.

I thought the first culprit was the worst "actor" of the two. You can tell who it was during the first few minutes. The second one was kind of crazy, so even though they aren't good at acting, you can't say for sure because everyone else is acting crazy too. Haha

If you watched the second one as a comedy you will enjoy it more. I forgot we had to look for a killer, or who died, and just enjoyed the ridiculousness of it.
On Mantis Sep 29, 2025
Title Mantis
I don't know why I keep seeing "You don't have to watch Kill Bok Soon first" in the comments.

1. They spoil the ending of Kill Bok Soon in this movie, so it will ruin your experience if you ever decided to watch Kill Bok Soon later on.
2. Kill Bok Soon makes an appearance in this movie, so she will be a stranger to you when this happens. You will also have a hard time figuring out what's the point of this additional "pop-up" character that comes out of nowhere.
3. Long flashbacks of a main character in Kill Bok Soon that is linked to all the main characters in this movie.
4. You have to understand the background of this organization, how they work, what are all these rankings, and what's the meaning of a bloody knife.
5. While Kill Bok Soon isn't a masterpiece, it is far superior to this movie. So, you will be ruining the better movie just to watch this mediocre spin-off.
On Mantis Sep 26, 2025
Title Mantis
Unoriginal underdeveloped pointless garbage. It's like they've decided to make a teen-targeted spin-off of Kill Bok Soon. It was like watching a teen drama with some comical violence. Can't believe they got all these actors and decided to go with this lame twist-less plot and those characters.