I can confidently say that this drama has far surpassed the novel it was adapted from. To be honest, the novel felt quite bland. While the writer did include some frustrating elements in the drama, most of the additions actually enhanced its overall quality.
Maybe he had a relatively normal life without much traumas. We can't expect everybody to have a hard past.
Yeah, I agree that he might not have faced any major traumas, but everyone goes through struggles while growing up. Showing that would have made Sang Yan feel less one-dimensional. As it stands, we donât know much about him beyond his love for Wen Yifan and the struggles tied to their relationship.
The main difference between this drama and The First Frostâwhich is making me like this one moreâis that we get to see more of Su Yeâs struggles. In TFF, Sang Yan mostly feels like an accessory to Wen Yifanâs trauma healing. Both MLs are perfect green flags, but Su Ye has a more distinct personality, which makes him more relatable to me. His struggles with his father, in particular, hit close to home because it reflects the reality of many households where sons often have a distant relationship with their fathers which is the same for me too.
This drama has one of the best SFLs of all time. Fang Kexin, hats off to you! I was really glad when she helped Shen Xifan think clearlyâshe really needed that. I also appreciated that she didnât interfere in the ML and FLâs relationship or cause trouble; instead, she actually supported them. Itâs great to see more dramas moving away from the typical "bitchy SFL" trope and giving us well-written, supportive second female leads.
Your words are a bit harsh, but, yes, most of us agreed early on that the bestie needed an attitude adjustment.…
I might have used strong words, but that's because I really dislike girls who behave like that. And itâs not like I said anything wrongâshe did all those things.
I didnât even bring up the whole misunderstanding where FL and her assumed that Suye was a father and how both she and the FL were clearly misbehaving with the ML because of it. But honestly, that part felt realistic to me. Donât get me wrong, but I also wouldnât advise a single friend to date a single motherâit comes with a lot of complications. So, in that sense, the situation felt pretty real.
Xu Xiang Ya was honestly the real trash in this drama. She can openly talk about her dates and using tricks on multiple guys, but the moment Li Yishen takes a picture or smiles at another girl, itâs suddenly a problem. Yep, thatâs feminism for you, I guess.
Theyâre just friends, not lovers, yet in episode 9, after finding out heâs going back to his hometown, she starts acting like he cheated on her. As adults, we often have to make decisions that take us away from our friends, but that doesnât mean we throw childish tantrums over it.
And after all this, the writers still expect us to root for their happy ending? Iâll say it againâshe might be a good friend to Shen Xifan, but sheâd make a terrible life partner for any guy, let alone Lin Yishen. She is for the streets and not a marriage material at all.
She started going back to her ballet class, someone mentioned something about medicine maybe she met a doctor…
How can you be sure she wonât leave him again if something even more traumatic happens in the future? To be honest, heâs already been abandoned twice, so I donât think I could trust my partner not to do the same if things got tough again. In my opinion, while she does love him a lot, she has a tendency to run away, and that issue hasnât been properly addressed yetâyet theyâre already back together.
In HL I never felt their relationship was unequal because even though DJX had trauma he never hurt SZ by leaving…
Yeah, I agree. Since WYF is a woman, her trauma is obviously more important than everyone else's. But Duan Jiaxu? Who even cares about his trauma? It doesnât matter at all in the grand scheme of things.
if we are are really putting real life. We learn to empathies and research its easy just search up the topic and…
I understand that WYFâs trauma is completely deep and painful, but that doesnât mean Sang Yanâs pain should be dismissed as minor. Your argument frames their suffering as a competition where only the more âsevereâ pain matters, but thatâs not how relationships work. You donât get to say, "SY's heartbreak is nowhere near as pitiful as WYF's trauma," and use that to justify her actions. Pain isnât a ranking systemâboth are valid and deserve acknowledgment.
You say "who really needs help? WYF." Yes, but that doesn't mean SY should be treated as an afterthought. He spent years supporting her, loving her, and being by her side. Yet, when she decided to leave, she made that choice for him instead of with him. Thatâs the issueâher lack of communication. You keep emphasizing that her decision made sense in her mind, but that doesnât erase the hurt she caused. Trauma explains actions; it doesnât excuse them.
Also, you argue that "SY still got his whole buddy system, work, and loving family," implying that his pain is somehow lesser because he has a support system. But support doesnât erase emotional suffering. Just because someone has friends doesnât mean abandonment doesnât hurt. SYâs pain isnât just about being leftâitâs about the fact that he was willing to fight for her, and she didnât let him.
Regarding therapy, you mention "you expect a person in survival mode to think 'I will go seek therapy'?" No, but thatâs exactly why communication is important. If she wasnât in the right state to seek help, SY could have encouraged her. Instead, she shut him out completely. You say "itâs up to the more normal people around her to help," yet when SY tries to be that person, people act like he was being overbearing. So which is it? Should he have stepped in more, or is he expected to back off and let her handle things alone?
Finally, your emergency room analogy doesnât quite work. Treating a head injury first doesnât mean ignoring a knee woundâit means both are addressed, just with priority. But thatâs not what happened here. WYF left without giving SY the chance to be part of the healing process. If she had communicated and asked for time, it would be different. Instead, she decided for both of them, leaving SY blindsided.
At the end of the day, no one expects a trauma survivor to act perfectly. But expecting basic communication and mutual respect in a relationship isnât being âillogicalâ or âlacking empathy.â Itâs holding both people accountable for their actionsâbecause love isnât just about who suffered more; itâs about navigating pain together, not alone.
I read the novel too, it is good but to be honest I am not a fan of how the writer wrote this exact part in the…
Didnât you say "I didn't like how they made Sang Yan mad at her and how Sang Yan in the novel handled her traumas"? Isnât that exactly what many of the so-called "hate comments" about WYF are pointing outâhow they didnât like that she left instead of fighting together? So why is it okay for you to dislike how SY handled things in the novel, but when people dislike how WYF handled things in the drama, theyâre suddenly unsympathetic to SA and PTSD victims?
Itâs not about invalidating WYFâs traumaâitâs about the double standard. Youâre allowed to critique SYâs portrayal, but the moment someone critiques WYFâs actions, theyâre accused of lacking empathy. Why the hypocrisy? Just like you prefer how the drama changed SYâs reaction, others might prefer how the novel handled WYFâs decision. People are simply expressing their preferences, just like you did. But instead of allowing that discussion, WYFâs supporters immediately shut it down by questioning peopleâs morality. Thatâs not fair.
At the end of the day, both characters are flawed, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion about how their struggles were portrayed. If you can dislike how SY was written in the novel without being accused of "not understanding his pain," then others should be able to dislike how WYF was written in the drama without being labeled as "lacking empathy for SA survivors."
https://x.com/Allcbizmelons/status/1898677551188541456?t=lPOILLXcz7BIA1APNbKbCA&s=19
I didnât even bring up the whole misunderstanding where FL and her assumed that Suye was a father and how both she and the FL were clearly misbehaving with the ML because of it. But honestly, that part felt realistic to me. Donât get me wrong, but I also wouldnât advise a single friend to date a single motherâit comes with a lot of complications. So, in that sense, the situation felt pretty real.
Theyâre just friends, not lovers, yet in episode 9, after finding out heâs going back to his hometown, she starts acting like he cheated on her. As adults, we often have to make decisions that take us away from our friends, but that doesnât mean we throw childish tantrums over it.
And after all this, the writers still expect us to root for their happy ending? Iâll say it againâshe might be a good friend to Shen Xifan, but sheâd make a terrible life partner for any guy, let alone Lin Yishen. She is for the streets and not a marriage material at all.
You say "who really needs help? WYF." Yes, but that doesn't mean SY should be treated as an afterthought. He spent years supporting her, loving her, and being by her side. Yet, when she decided to leave, she made that choice for him instead of with him. Thatâs the issueâher lack of communication. You keep emphasizing that her decision made sense in her mind, but that doesnât erase the hurt she caused. Trauma explains actions; it doesnât excuse them.
Also, you argue that "SY still got his whole buddy system, work, and loving family," implying that his pain is somehow lesser because he has a support system. But support doesnât erase emotional suffering. Just because someone has friends doesnât mean abandonment doesnât hurt. SYâs pain isnât just about being leftâitâs about the fact that he was willing to fight for her, and she didnât let him.
Regarding therapy, you mention "you expect a person in survival mode to think 'I will go seek therapy'?" No, but thatâs exactly why communication is important. If she wasnât in the right state to seek help, SY could have encouraged her. Instead, she shut him out completely. You say "itâs up to the more normal people around her to help," yet when SY tries to be that person, people act like he was being overbearing. So which is it? Should he have stepped in more, or is he expected to back off and let her handle things alone?
Finally, your emergency room analogy doesnât quite work. Treating a head injury first doesnât mean ignoring a knee woundâit means both are addressed, just with priority. But thatâs not what happened here. WYF left without giving SY the chance to be part of the healing process. If she had communicated and asked for time, it would be different. Instead, she decided for both of them, leaving SY blindsided.
At the end of the day, no one expects a trauma survivor to act perfectly. But expecting basic communication and mutual respect in a relationship isnât being âillogicalâ or âlacking empathy.â Itâs holding both people accountable for their actionsâbecause love isnât just about who suffered more; itâs about navigating pain together, not alone.
Itâs not about invalidating WYFâs traumaâitâs about the double standard. Youâre allowed to critique SYâs portrayal, but the moment someone critiques WYFâs actions, theyâre accused of lacking empathy. Why the hypocrisy? Just like you prefer how the drama changed SYâs reaction, others might prefer how the novel handled WYFâs decision. People are simply expressing their preferences, just like you did. But instead of allowing that discussion, WYFâs supporters immediately shut it down by questioning peopleâs morality. Thatâs not fair.
At the end of the day, both characters are flawed, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion about how their struggles were portrayed. If you can dislike how SY was written in the novel without being accused of "not understanding his pain," then others should be able to dislike how WYF was written in the drama without being labeled as "lacking empathy for SA survivors."