I agree. Some people are acting like Jun is a victim of SA. He is not. Sorn's a dick too, but too many give Jun…
Your entire argument is predicated on the idea that Sorn was being honest -- with himself and with Jun -- when he began his affair with Jun. Yet, from the very beginning, it has been amply clear that this whole sex buddies schtick was disingenuous on Sorn's part, to say the least. And no, Jun wasn't pressuring him: he just wanted clarity on what their relationship was. You can't just string people along, and then cry "pressure" as soon as the other person asks for clarity.
Just to say, I don't really have that much invested in taking one person's side over another in this show. Love is more complex than that. I just don't think your argument holds water.
Sorn deserves better then the whiny baby jun anyways, or did everyone just forget that jun agreed to this type…
The power dynamic in the show flows entirely in one direction: Sorn is the older guy, Jun's boss, and is more sexually mature. He knows he does not go for younger guys, and claims to be worried about Tai's reaction: yet he initiated and instructed Jun in every sexual position imaginable, and almost always on his terms. Worse, he knew that Jun liked him and nevertheless toyed with his affections. But Jun is the whiny brat? Sure, Jan. But if so, Jun's earned his right to be -- more than Sorn earned his right to love him and to be jealous of him for so much as being near another gay man.
And don't worry. Enough people share your opinion on here! And I, for one, issue no malediction.
This episode was so cathartic, with Oat proving himself to be one of the best actors in all of Thai drama, let…
I'm with you on Oat. It's so hard to balance the petulance of young love and the integrity of someone who knows himself and what he wants. It's a real conflict, and he portrays it so well.
That is totally unexpected as I didn't had any expectations or real interest before starting this drama, but I'm…
I'm completely on board with you when it comes to Choi Jae Hyeok. But when they put that idiotic line -- "It's really hard to imagine two men together" -- I nearly lost it. Still? In 2025?
Yeah, unless you watch this show as unintentional pure camp, you can't get far. But hey, have you heard? The drought…
I couldn't have put it better. I didn't know about Soul Mate, but I'm one of the rare creatures here who does not get excited by KBLs, because I find their chasteness unbearable. Let's see about the others. I also heard word about a BDSM JBL film on the way, but I don't know which of these will be picked up for international distribution and which not.
Do tell me what you think of Sannin Fuufu. It started off well, and then began to seem to me as a spreadsheet analysis of polyamory and bisexuality than as an organically realised project. But maybe that's just me.
Hats off to Oat and Boat for being professionals, and going all the way...
But can we please stop harping on about how "difficult" this must have been for them, and how they should be paid more, as if filming love scenes -- especially gay love scenes -- must be by definition onerous? It's acting, it's their job, and they are really good at it. We don't make a big deal when the acting in question involves murder or brutal violence, but as soon as (gay) sex comes in, "oh to simulate sex... in front of all those cameras!"
10 
4 
3 
1 
Just to say, I don't really have that much invested in taking one person's side over another in this show. Love is more complex than that. I just don't think your argument holds water.
But look at it this way. At least the horror didn't last a whole episode!
And don't worry. Enough people share your opinion on here! And I, for one, issue no malediction.
A friend: Oh, is it about brothers?
How could he have possibly guessed?
Do tell me what you think of Sannin Fuufu. It started off well, and then began to seem to me as a spreadsheet analysis of polyamory and bisexuality than as an organically realised project. But maybe that's just me.
But can we please stop harping on about how "difficult" this must have been for them, and how they should be paid more, as if filming love scenes -- especially gay love scenes -- must be by definition onerous? It's acting, it's their job, and they are really good at it. We don't make a big deal when the acting in question involves murder or brutal violence, but as soon as (gay) sex comes in, "oh to simulate sex... in front of all those cameras!"
Thy will be done...
Thy king-dom come...