Kate

I saw her and I right away thought - I need it!

It's all about the context. Usually in discussion it has more of a demeanor tone. It's a bit like calling your friend "bitch" is different than calling a random person you interact with "bitch".

I said what I wanted to say, pointed out his sweetie was wrong, the OP's reply and calling him toxic for no reason was wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You are set in stone with your view, so I will just remove myself from this conversation, since it would be rather pointless to continue.

I wouldn't even call it strictly misogynistic anymore, but it's often used to indicate someone is "below" you and not worthy being taken seriously. It was in past used by men more, but now it's used as much by women for the same effect.
Personally, I got the "sweetie" and "honey" from other women more than men on this website, but then there are more women than men here, so that makes sense.

If it's true, you should contact the people whom he plagiarized, not use it as a reply to his comment that was not even related to reviews. If it's true, and you think it's wrong enough to call him out, why not report it with screen shots as a proof. Admins deal with situations like that if it's backed up with photos.

I'm not. I clearly said, no matter what his intentions were, it's annoying and not good to use sweetie. My case was - he was called toxic before he did anything toxic. The person who replied to his comment did act childish and ridiculous. I hate the word "sweetie" so if someone used it on me I would just block them.

But you are acting like like him saying it was completely unprovoked. When the other person started with accusations with no proof. They literally accused him of plagiarism ;/ But you are acting as if he attacked a poor soul who did nothing wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If you decided to point out his wrong behavior in that conversation, you should also do the same for the other person.

Sweetie is an annoying term whenever it's used by men or women, and that is a fact. Whenever the intention might be from the person who uses it, the person that receives usually see it as demeaning. So being annoyed when someone uses it is valid.

That said, the other person literally said he has "toxic masculinity" ONLY based on the fact he said episode 15th was trashy. Which is also ridiculous behavior. Guys are not misogynistic and toxic just because they don't like something and say it. He was not spamming with negative comments... maybe he wrote a few, but in the sea of 2178, it's hardly noticeable. Comment section is here for both positive and negative opinions.

That's a big accusation that makes little sense... if you did it for all your replies, people would call you out on it in comments under said reviews. but I read quite a few of yours, and I never saw anyone complaining about it.

and rewriting comments from users into your reviews < that's a big accusation, you better have an actual proof of it.

You know what I like about his character (not as a person)? That they show how weak he is. I love that there is no glorification of villains in here. None of the bad guys is truly this smart, cunning, strong and confident - they are all weak and pathetic one way or another.

Guys. This is truly an amazing show 😭
Such an underappreciated gem 😭

So much pain, but in such a good way! I want more! Stab me to death with feels!
Why is everyone so good. Like, even the ex-psychiatrist - perfect shit start for a perfect character development to happen! Even the villains are perfectly written.

Good plot, characters, visuals, and quotes!
"𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘺. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬. 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶'𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸."

lets bait people into watching with shirtless screen shots of Moon You Kang 🤡
then they will stay for the quality story.

ep 5 stuff - mostly rant about Park Seung Ha's character.

When she said there are scientists who accept the existence of premonitions and prophetic dreams and then names Carl Jung as one 🤣 He was not a scientist by today's standards. Now we would call him philosopher in terms of his ideas concerning psychology. He did scientific studies, but in psychiatry. The whole synchronicity was just his theory that was never tested 🙃 Damn I cannot with this ex-psychiatrist.

Je Gal Gil and Lee Moo Gyeol - what a great duo 🤣
It's also so hard to hare the adult version of Goo Tae Man.

Bish legit went - go die somewhere that will not cause issue to me - to her patient who tired to commit suicide 🙃 She was not only unethical he was legit trash in the past. BISH LITERALLY HAD HER PATIWENT THAT TRIED TO KILL HIMSELF COMFORT HER, AFTER SHE TOLD HIM TO DIE SOMEWHERE ELSE 🤡🤡

She cannot read people at all. I kind of feel bad for her. How the writer could accomplish writing such a failure of a worker... Her as a person - I don't care. But her flaws are exactly what you should not have working with people who might be facing any psychological issues 🙃

Putting her character aside, I love it so much. This drama just hits all the right spots 😭

glad you enjoyed it :)

or... some people just don't enjoy this one show, but overall like thriller and mystery genres.
We truly need to stop with this generalization that is someone does not enjoy one show, they must just either dislike the show genre, not know how to appreciate it etc. No... it's just this one show.
(to be clear, I am enjoying Blind, but I disagree with the idea people dislike it because they are impatient with thriller/mystery genre).

they told us what he has on Sung Hoon - there were members of jury that were related to people involved in the case by past encounters and jobs, hence the verdict was invalid and the Chinese guy can demand retrial - which would be a stain on Sung Hoon career.

Expecting reviews for a show that barely started airing is not a way to go. Realistically speaking, reviews should be written either after finishing or dropping the show. I wish admins would just block the option of writing reviews for airing shows altogether.

but I do agree that there are truly not that many comments under this title. Might be the lack of the extremely popular cast, that usually brings more viewers to the table... Or lack of the romance tag, that also usually has more viewers interested.

Everyone I talked to about this show picked judge as the killer. I have not seen one person even entertaining the idea juror might be the killer. So if that's what the writers were going for - they failed.

It's for sure fun. I was entertained through the all the 4 episodes that are out.

I did not see anyone calling writers stupid in the comment section... nor calling viewers stupid.

Plot holes are a mark of either lazy or poor writing - that's a fact. Plot holes are not a trope in genre or a writing tool. Some things can already be pointed out as plot holes - minor things like parts of the investigation that plot wise are already done, so we can be more or less sure they will not come back in future episodes.

That said, 4 episodes into a drama, in most cases, for major plot aspects, we can't talk about plot holes. That conversation can only happen after the drama is over and questions, actions and plots that were introduced were not explained.

But your idea that plot holes are the way to make a drama last these episodes and be entertaining, otherwise it would end right away is not correct. You can have either - smart villains/killers and smart cops, smart villains and stupid cops, stupid villains and stupid cops. For now it falls under smart killer and stupid cops. But it is possible to write a complex and longer story with smart protagonists that do their job right, and the show not ending on episode one.

ps. I scrolled down a bit more and actually saw one person getting way too emotional about this show and calling people involved shitheads. But I always believe that if you disagree with someone you should talk to them rather than write about it in a separate comment. Especially since it's literally just that one user, so it's not like making a separate comment seems more efficient (how it would be if there were more people who should read it as a reply to their actions).