Kate

He did not fire her. He wants to use her. He needs a good face for his new project, but she would obviously not agree to it if she became a partner (better gig for her). So he had to force her out of her high horse and make it seem as if this offer is him helping her.

He never wanted for her to truly dream big. He was using her from the start.

This is such a fun watch. Jang Gi Do is obviously behind the killings. The writers want to pin it on Si Baek for entertainment. Maybe they will use it to make him an actual suspect later (they already had it go that way with the detective and his "story" during the questioning).

The cast is crazy good. In some weird way I really like Oh Ha Ran. Her "축하해" after hearing the dude was murdered was amazing 🤣

That's what I do. I don't really read reviews before I watch a show, but I tend to check some after I'm done. Especially ones that rated the show differently than me. I usually upvote reviews that I feel like explained their opinion/position well - if even if I disagree, I can understand why they liked/disliked the show.

Here's the thing about dominating review section - if you write a lot you establish some kind of presence there, which leads to people remembering you, which leads to them checking your reviews, because they know more or less what to expect (what are the focus points, your writing style, if you include spoilers etc.), which leads to more upvotes, review being on top, and getting more people to read it... and it's the same story all over again.

While I'm 100% okay with upvoting other review, downvoting someone just because other people read and upvote their reviews is not a good thing. This is how we get "sdjhfhsgfds this show is sooo goood!" copied x10 to hit the minimum number of characters - type of reviews on the first page, because people try to downvote actual review for one reason or the other...

Downvote is not there to making sure everyone can equal chance to be "on top", but to show the review was not helpful.

that's... one of the most counterproductive things you might have done. If you really disliked the review, you should have just downvote and that's it.
Your comment will only bring more people to read it, and at least some of them will hit upvote, which will only bring his review up, which is opposite to what you wanted ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I saw her and I right away thought - I need it!

It's all about the context. Usually in discussion it has more of a demeanor tone. It's a bit like calling your friend "bitch" is different than calling a random person you interact with "bitch".

I said what I wanted to say, pointed out his sweetie was wrong, the OP's reply and calling him toxic for no reason was wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You are set in stone with your view, so I will just remove myself from this conversation, since it would be rather pointless to continue.

I wouldn't even call it strictly misogynistic anymore, but it's often used to indicate someone is "below" you and not worthy being taken seriously. It was in past used by men more, but now it's used as much by women for the same effect.
Personally, I got the "sweetie" and "honey" from other women more than men on this website, but then there are more women than men here, so that makes sense.

If it's true, you should contact the people whom he plagiarized, not use it as a reply to his comment that was not even related to reviews. If it's true, and you think it's wrong enough to call him out, why not report it with screen shots as a proof. Admins deal with situations like that if it's backed up with photos.

I'm not. I clearly said, no matter what his intentions were, it's annoying and not good to use sweetie. My case was - he was called toxic before he did anything toxic. The person who replied to his comment did act childish and ridiculous. I hate the word "sweetie" so if someone used it on me I would just block them.

But you are acting like like him saying it was completely unprovoked. When the other person started with accusations with no proof. They literally accused him of plagiarism ;/ But you are acting as if he attacked a poor soul who did nothing wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If you decided to point out his wrong behavior in that conversation, you should also do the same for the other person.

Sweetie is an annoying term whenever it's used by men or women, and that is a fact. Whenever the intention might be from the person who uses it, the person that receives usually see it as demeaning. So being annoyed when someone uses it is valid.

That said, the other person literally said he has "toxic masculinity" ONLY based on the fact he said episode 15th was trashy. Which is also ridiculous behavior. Guys are not misogynistic and toxic just because they don't like something and say it. He was not spamming with negative comments... maybe he wrote a few, but in the sea of 2178, it's hardly noticeable. Comment section is here for both positive and negative opinions.

That's a big accusation that makes little sense... if you did it for all your replies, people would call you out on it in comments under said reviews. but I read quite a few of yours, and I never saw anyone complaining about it.

and rewriting comments from users into your reviews < that's a big accusation, you better have an actual proof of it.

You know what I like about his character (not as a person)? That they show how weak he is. I love that there is no glorification of villains in here. None of the bad guys is truly this smart, cunning, strong and confident - they are all weak and pathetic one way or another.

Guys. This is truly an amazing show 😭
Such an underappreciated gem 😭

So much pain, but in such a good way! I want more! Stab me to death with feels!
Why is everyone so good. Like, even the ex-psychiatrist - perfect shit start for a perfect character development to happen! Even the villains are perfectly written.

Good plot, characters, visuals, and quotes!
"𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘺. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘰𝘬𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬. 𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶'𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴𝘵, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸."

lets bait people into watching with shirtless screen shots of Moon You Kang 🤡
then they will stay for the quality story.

ep 5 stuff - mostly rant about Park Seung Ha's character.

When she said there are scientists who accept the existence of premonitions and prophetic dreams and then names Carl Jung as one 🤣 He was not a scientist by today's standards. Now we would call him philosopher in terms of his ideas concerning psychology. He did scientific studies, but in psychiatry. The whole synchronicity was just his theory that was never tested 🙃 Damn I cannot with this ex-psychiatrist.

Je Gal Gil and Lee Moo Gyeol - what a great duo 🤣
It's also so hard to hare the adult version of Goo Tae Man.

Bish legit went - go die somewhere that will not cause issue to me - to her patient who tired to commit suicide 🙃 She was not only unethical he was legit trash in the past. BISH LITERALLY HAD HER PATIWENT THAT TRIED TO KILL HIMSELF COMFORT HER, AFTER SHE TOLD HIM TO DIE SOMEWHERE ELSE 🤡🤡

She cannot read people at all. I kind of feel bad for her. How the writer could accomplish writing such a failure of a worker... Her as a person - I don't care. But her flaws are exactly what you should not have working with people who might be facing any psychological issues 🙃

Putting her character aside, I love it so much. This drama just hits all the right spots 😭

glad you enjoyed it :)