Someone please answer me, if this is not the Yu zheng+Yang mi collaboration that was rumored and this is not the romance drama with the screen writer wan wanping that Yang mi was rumored to be starring in, does that mean that they have something good cooking...
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
There are over 2000 comments on this drama, but very few of them are actually talking about the drama. When you subtract actual comments on the drama what you have left are lengthy arguments with fans expressing their anger at users that found something wrong with the drama, yet I haven't seen anyone attacking fans for liking the drama. Some of them even went as far as calling out others for being "anti's" and "fake accounts". Though it's more peaceful now it still irks some fans to hear criticism on the artists or drama, so they can't help themselves. Every now and then they make unfriendly outbursts which is the reason we keep going round and round here. I'm only commenting on it bcoz I've analyzed the whole situation and I'm comparing it to the comments section of other other dramas, they have less activity bcoz there is less drama and people are peacefully sharing their opinions. I haven't started watching this yet bcoz i like to bingewatch, so I'm waiting for it to complete airing and for real reviews and ratings to come out, but I can't help saying something every now and then.
Whether it's in actual cash or in terms of the time we set aside to try their works out or the support and dedication…
@ sony_t I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
The term “humble beginnings” and “hard working” is to indicate that some people made it to where they…
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been 1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater. 2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
I find it distasteful to bring up "humble beginnings", "hard work" and every other pitiful subject everytime an…
Whether it's in actual cash or in terms of the time we set aside to try their works out or the support and dedication fans show to support them, we are the entitled ones not the other way round. It's called the "entertainment industry" for a reason.
I find it distasteful to bring up "humble beginnings", "hard work" and every other pitiful subject everytime an actual argument is going on an individuals performance. Is the aim to gain pity to cover up flaws or to make people with contrary opinions look bad. And again with this silly "haters" theory. I know that what you are doing seems like a righteous cause to you but let me ask, if you were disappointed again and again by a particular product or service and when you complain, instead of acknowledging their flaws and promising to improve, they go on and on about how pitiful their business has been, how "hateful" you are not to sympathize with them and how the right thing to do is to continue taking their crap and swallow your grievances... I don't know about you but I would be stunned speechless. The attitude is seriously putting the idol in a bad light and doesn't change the fact one bit if the performance is good or bad. Just my opinion, so please no one should troll on me...
If only I had had the good sense to follow my instincts...
Lol, American tv series are not binge worthy at all, I can only count with one hand how many I finished successfully. At least here most are great and consistent in writing.
I have the same impression about the age gap, however ZLY is playing the stubbornness very well. Also it is funny…
Successful yet without substance, as for zly I wonder why she is so insistent that she does her stunts when we have eyes. There is nothing wrong with having body doubles, I don't think anybody would be happy to hear that she injured herself trying to impress her audience with her non existent martial art skills, we have accepted that the era has gone.
Her acting isn't the real problem. She has a very hateful background so she just have lots of haters. After doing…
I think it's mostly bcoz of her popularity. She has become one of the biggest actresses in China, so it makes sense that jealous fans try to put her down , what better way than to attack her acting. But her resilience has shown that she's not just a pretty face and no one can put her down period.
1 
I'm not arguing against defending the actress though and I agree that criticism should be constructive and not an outright insult. My main points from the beginning have been
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
1. It doesn't help to attack anyone that says something contrary bcoz even if you do it wouldn't change their minds if they thought someone was too old for a role or not acting right. It would be more helpful to counterargue "I disagree this +ve, this -ve... and not tag anyone a hater.
2. As for bringing up "hard work" and "humble beginnings", I personally feel that there is not one actress that has been onscreen that did not suffer, sweat and bleed to get to where they are, even if they've only been onscreen once playing a support role. They might even be more talented and have the most potential but they never get the chance. I remember now and then sometimes i see an actress and try to follow her works but I find out that their career never kicked off and I'm like "what a waste.." So when you bring up those topics in an unrelated argument it doesn't make sense to me. Instead of saying things like that I think it would also be wise to counterargue peacefully, listing out her merits ( in the actual line of conversation), I think that's a better line of defense.
And again with this silly "haters" theory. I know that what you are doing seems like a righteous cause to you but let me ask, if you were disappointed again and again by a particular product or service and when you complain, instead of acknowledging their flaws and promising to improve, they go on and on about how pitiful their business has been, how "hateful" you are not to sympathize with them and how the right thing to do is to continue taking their crap and swallow your grievances... I don't know about you but I would be stunned speechless.
The attitude is seriously putting the idol in a bad light and doesn't change the fact one bit if the performance is good or bad.
Just my opinion, so please no one should troll on me...