Kate

I don't have that good of a memory, I just rewatched the scene hahahha

Tian was shown to get to hospital in ambulance tho lol

Also, it's more of him organizing the car race not just suggesting it. Him and Tul planned how to "clear the road", where to race etc. So even if he did not take part in the race, he took part in organizing it. Also, Tul is partially responsible too. So IF you planned to rob a bank and had all prepared, but did not take part in the robbing itself, even legally speaking you would be partially responsible. Since the criminal activity would not happen without your involvement.

the website said she died in the car race. So Tian would be driving his own car, and the other dude would be driving his own. The guy obviously did not "win" the car since Tian's parents were the ones that "sold" it after the accident.

1. then who drove his car?
2. as you said, he got to the hospital in ambulance so it was not his friends who drove him there.

it does not match the directing and editing style of all the other episodes and scenes. That's why I am saying it's not cohesive.

he did not. Tul literally told him before he got into the car that it's a bad idea, and Tian said he has to race coz the other dude will see him as coward otherwise.

If it was not him driving the car, who was? There was only Tul next to him right before the race. So what, Tul went for a race when Tian passed out and went to hospital?

Legally speaking him not taking part in the race makes him innocent. FOR ME morally speaking he is still partially responsible as he was the one to suggest the race in the first place. He was the one to put that illegal activity in motion.

well, still bad directing, as it does not match the style of all the other scenes. You can show the raw aspects of the scene while still being cohesive in style.

I am scared they will give some bullshit explanation how he was not involved and is blameless to give that happy Disney ending, where he main character can be nothing but good.

I'd still call it poor directing. Most dramas (this one not being expectation) have cohesive style of directing for all scenes. So switching is just this one for this one scene makes no sense. It took me out of the story a bit, coz it just did not flow well with the rest of the episode.

Pretty sure the badminton scene was how he got diagnosed with the heart problem and they said he needs the surgery. While the transplant surgery happened right after the race. When they get him to surgery room he is wearing the same shirt he was wearing in the casino and before the car race.

It felt like a one take self made video. Mostly just still camera with angles changed just few times. At times it was also extremely shaky. There was not focus on any detail. When they were kissing, the camera was literally in their faces, way too close, it made me feel like I'm watching home made soft-porn.

It just felt like there was not much thought put into planning what and how they want to present. What should be the focus of the shot, what it should represent.

At the end, the acting was good, but the directing did not compliment it at all. Compare it even to the lunch scene. How the camera cut from Shu Yi to Shi De. How we saw the build up of emotions with the shots of Shi De typing faster and stronger as he can't focus and control his emotions. None of these details and plan of directing was seen in the sofa scene. It was like: you do the acting and we will just stand and film it from like 3 different angles and try to edit it later.

I know a lot of people feel bad for Tian, and I get that since we mostly observed him as his "new self" that is caring, loving and selfless. But whenever it was his car or the other dude's he was racing with car that hit Torfun, Tian is still at least partially responsible for her death, since it was his idea to race in the first place. At least partially, because of his irresponsible behavior in the past a good person died.

Unless they will tell us in the future episodes that Tian had literally nothing to do with the accident and the car race was not the reason she died. But that's just bad writing, so I hope it's not going this way lol

but the police investigation (as stated in the article) said it was the car with his plate number.
Even assuming it was not his car, he is still partially responsible, since he was the one to even suggest the car race in the first place. So it's not like he is blameless here.

ironic how the director was pushing Sam so bad to ace the acting in the drunk scene, to the point of encouraging him to actually get drunk...
while he himself delivered such a poor directing job lol

yeah I struggled a bit at first hahahaha
but it got sooo much better later on :D

Who is the killer? God fucking knows.
What I know is the fact the police apparently did not take statement from Jin Mook after his daughter was kidnapped and her fingers were found. If this is not the most ridiculous and shitty police work, I don't know what is.

Well.. for each their own. It took me 2 hours to finish first episode of Mouse with the amount of incorrect and dumb ideas presented in it, while I was glued to screen while watching BE.
Mouse is more plot driven, BE is character driven. I myself prefer slow burn character driven shows.

it does sounds like Kao's voice at the end. I checked few times. Maybe I am tripping now too hahaha

The test was NOT initially created based on whatever dominant functions you are talking about. I'm questioning validity of the test. you cannot half way through change and re-do the theory to the point it's not recognizable.

Most articles that "support" Myers–Briggs were written and published in association with Myers-Briggs Foundation and independent studies were extremely critical about it. As a scientific method it's close to zodiac signs. The authors had NO training in understanding psychological theories or how psychological tools should be created. They had less than basic understanding of psychology as a study field.

They completely ignored THE MOST IMPORTANT step in creating any theory or test based on that theory: validation and research. They made a theory without checking if it express in reality - guess what, it doesn't. That's why Myers–Briggs is not taken seriously in scientific community. Coz it fails all scientific criteria to be taken serious.

ohhhhh..... I totally missed the switch in narration (this is what happens when you watch an episode in the middle of the night with low volume audio hahaha).
Well then, scrap my idea hahaha